What Dr. Jonathan Couey has to say is indeed crucial for the future of Humanity. He may be wrong, but we must understand that he may be right just as well.
Even if he's wrong about almost everything, he's right to insist we remember and analyze what happened in 2020.
I'm going to be brutally honest here, a lot of the MFM has come across like a movement more interested in upper class concerns than actually striking at the root of these abuses.
Dr Couey is one of the very few voices that actually has a focus on how everyone can be liberated from this nonsense and I admire him for that.
Edit: Dr Couey is absolutely wrong about Mathew Crawford for starters. And has attacked others in ways I know to be false.
There are so many pieces to the plandemic puzzle, that it behooves everybody who cares to listen to JJ. If he is right then everything we thought we knew is out the door.
As a casual observer of the human condition, and the medical freedom movement (or whatever moniker you choose), I try to not take sides. I first came to watch one of JJ Couey's shows two maybe three years ago. I found him to be intelligent. End of compliments. I observed what I thought was arrogance and super ego. He appeared to be acting, shall I say, superior to his audience. Whatever his information, right or wrong, is sidelined by a miserable personality. The second time I watched him, I was forced to stop after several minutes. He appears to have a social problem, especially when others disagree. He does not seem to have the ability to get along with others. He creates friction, and there's enough of that in the world.
In the first few seconds, Nass mentions the “genome”. Of course the problem for her is that she does not understand, or refuses to admit, that the specimen sequenced is never pure.
Sounds to me like JJ is finally ready to endorse the “virus challenge”. We all welcome JJ when he is ready.
JJ's larger problem is not merely "language", but in a nasty level of politics. After I promoted him, funded him, and helped him get his message out, he began making up stories about me that were either against any evidence, fabricated, or the result of his own actions. He then began to demand that people disassociate with me based on these stories. For instance, he put me on the wall of shame, saying that I came into the pushback against vaccines "too late for it to matter" when I was writing warnings in 2020, and was possibly the first person (all the way back in February 2021) to put together data and publicly say, "These [things] don't work, and the nations using them more are suffering more."
Why attack somebody like that? It is dishonest, and discredits his high fidelity persona. He even insuates, with no evidence, that I'm involved in money laundering. That's false, and there will never be evidence beyond, "Since I got mad at him, any business he runs must be dirty money." That's disturbing and clearly unethical to toss that in my direction, particularly when the only reason I considered building a new business was to fund him specifically (along with other content producers like Liam Sturgess, Tonika Todorova, and Gabe Wilson). Now it's a tiny company with very little flow (I have no time for it, at least partially due to JJ). No community that tolerates that sort of "burn it all down" quasi-rumor-slander mill will ever succeed, which should be obvious to anyone with basic social sense who has committed the sacrifice to build businesses or other organizations.
Why is he even building a persona? He has a quality theory that needs investigation. Such investigation might involve data mining or mapping. Is there some way we might tell if sequences in databases are real or modeled, and then identify which ones are clones? Instead, he says he was given a mission by God, and repeats his idea like the theory is a TED Talk development mission instead of an invitation for investigation. Coupled with his wild swinging (I do agree with him on some of his identifications of chaos agents, but he should distinguish between questions and accusations focusing on the web of players that have substantial money and organization pushing their interests), this makes him look somewhat crazy to some people. Somebody who can't tell the difference between a small business with a personal $32k investment, still looking to profit, and a $100 million investment scheme run by a con artist who told his followers to sell Pfizer at the market bottom [again] is somebody who can't see straight, and their messianic claims look increasingly like the product of an unstable mind.
He insists repeatedly that I'm "on Team Malone", based on having met the man twice, including having lunch with him at CHD. But I wasn't planning on going to CHD, then made plans to meet JJ there right before the event, not knowing who would be in attendance. JJ was encouraging me to stay close to Malone (have Malone on my podcast, which I was uncomfortable with), and I wanted to understand why Malone would not support the work he asked me to do on the military health database. I came to consider Malone's silence and gaslighting to be treasonous, which I haven't hesitated to say in print and in voice.
JJ now publicly mocks the abuse I went through as a child growing up in a cult over which there is now a noteworthy trial (thankfully) progressing. Somebody who will turn on those who helped them so viciously cannot lead until they've solved the internal problem that leads to their own dishonesty and cruelty. The only way such a person can lead is as an authoritarian cult leader. Everyone who wants to avoid being flamed down will stop participating as an independent mind, and that kills the value of scientific collaboration.
JJ's promotion of the notion that infectious clones can provide a magic trick is important, and it's a shame there aren't more people promoting it. At the same time, he should be clearly rebuked by a community for deranged attacks without evidence that only circularly fit a model. That's unscientific thinking, and causes breakdowns in communication. Nobody has written about his theory more often than I have, but now fewer people will be pointed to the explanations.
JJ should also be more willing to take criticism and advice. It is highly unusual for a 50-year-old to have such resistance to putting his ideas into words. I could tell that he was overconfident in his writing and resisting the chore, so I privately offered to help him write a book. I put together a shared document where we could work, and began setting up a framework. He never showed up for the task of just drafting an outline. It was also hard to get him to do basic things to help him self-fund, but that is not atypical of people who have been trapped in the academic mindset for a number of years. He makes himself difficult to coach by even the most charitable approach.
Should we even leave the infectious clones model in his hands?
At this point, I do not think so. But that nobody else is picking up that ball tells us the sad story that the dissident movement is largely a political disaster. This weekend's Rescue the Republic was indicative of that. It looked pathetic, to be frank. And it involved people like Malone, Johnson, and Kory, who are more and less responsible for the fact that incorrect data dominated the discussion of the military health database, when the corrected data I prepared would have been (a) useful, and (b) more persuasive in bringing people to our side. Russell Brand? What warped universe did we enter?
The dissident movement is weakening due to its domination by bad actors who just need your $30 million to build a hospital system...ooops, money gone, or your $100 million for a hedge fund, or mix good data with batcov insane data, then cross-promote. Also, they need your time to watch these 43 hours of alien contact videos.
What we needed was to network the rest of us (outside the big money and influence steering some obvious names and personalities) so that we weren't paved over. JJ's actions narrow the messengers and community to such a small pool while attacking all else that it is obviously doomed to fail. I have numerous friends in science whom I was working to nudge into the dissident movement who have kept silent at least partially due to watching the way JJ treated me and others. These aren't irreversible problems, but they aren't likely to be fixed, in my estimation.
I have been following nearly every show of his for the past year and a half. I have never heard him level these kind of accusations against you. I have also never seen him engage in „politics“. He is straightforward as far as I am concerned. And he his hurt.
The main point is that his message is one which is important, that being „RNA can not pandemic“. How would you model that with data? I see very few people who make that point, which from a legal and political perspective is the key to the whole pandemic preparedness scare. Which is why I will keep supporting him.
JJ knows that I appreciate your work, and share it. He has never been „political“ about it to me.
Therefore your lengthy comment seems somewhat „political“ to me.
That’s right, “ rna cannot pandemic.” If anything can pandemic” we all would like to see scientific evidence. As for now, there’s apparently no scientific evidence that contagion is a true phenomenon.
Some of his attacks on me are veiled. He did put me on his wall of shame one time. I sent him a screenshot of me warning people in 2020. Since I had to threaten to sue him over lies, he started explaining things about me without mentioning my name sometimes. But he has a private chat where he and Mark regularly attack me, and details are discussed there.
If you watched his shows, you may have seen the one where Kevin Barret interviews Malone and Rose. Just the mention of my name causes JJ to stop and act as if that's an indication of wrongdoing. All I had said was that VAERS data was a safety signal, but isn't useful for mortality estimates.
In the context of what we are up against, Dr. Couey is one of very, very few scientists who is raising essentially critical doubts over a planned scenario. There may come a time when your grievances can be addressed. At this point in time I would urge you to understand that, unless you challenge his core points in a meaningful way, it is the honorable and right thing to throw your clout behind the things that really matter now. And that is the question of RNA pandemics as a general danger.
I have watched many of Couey's presentations, and contributed to many of them. Many of his talking points came from me, though I am certain he will now deny that (in some cases, I have transcripts saved).
"We should be okay with fanatical slanderers claiming to be missionaries from god ascending to leadership, if the ends justify the means."
How many times in history were those famous last words?
In the meantime, I'm one of the few people left investigating the likely poisoning of people that was part of the pandemic illusion. I'm the only person promoting the correct military health data that solves a lot of the debates quickly. I'm one of the only people tracking players through the occult networks/circles that have not just one illusion (pandemics) in its arsenal, but many. So, here we are, and you know what his work is. Do you know mine, which is encompassing, and aims at the root?
"There are no means by which I can hold somebody accountable."
This is a nihilistic response, and it rarely leads anywhere good.
What is the purpose of the quotes in your comment? Are you putting words in my mouth?
This article was not about your contribution. You will notice that your substack is one of a handful which I recommend. So there is no question of respect.
If you watch the discussion of last nights presentation at Doctor for Covid Ethics International you will notice that I have also pointed out that the pandemic scare is indeed but one of many games the occult oligarchy is playing and that we have „Freedom Fighters“ who need to answer about their involvement in such cults. Reiner Fuellmich is a case in point, and my articles about him and Scientology draw from your work (which is referenced in my articles).
But please understand that as far as the pandemic potential scare is concerned Dr Couey is leading the way. And I will continue to point out the importance of that aspect, as I will also put on the record that he has never (!) tried to get me to change my focus. I do notice that exactly this is what has been tried from various sides with respect of my articles about Couey‘s work.
"What is the purpose of the quotes in your comment? Are you putting words in my mouth?"
I'm telling you how I follow the implications of your words.
"This article was not about your contribution. You will notice that your substack is one of a handful which I recommend. So there is no question of respect."
I'm not sure what this has to do with the conversation, which I'm guessing is the result of a cognitive hiccup.
"But please understand that as far as the pandemic potential scare is concerned Dr Couey is leading the way."
I strongly disagree. He is leading a firm conclusion without experiment and dodges the question of whether there was poisoning or supply chain sabotage. I believe that he is being used by military intelligence, whom I believe his friend Mark works for. I believe the people Mark answers to were behind the destruction of my home and the attempt of my life (and my wife's) two years ago.
I think that JJ is now being helped by a digital army that stalks me and pushes out the slander aimed at me because I'm the only person pointing out a set of facts that contradicts the version of Couey's theory that is being primarily promoted.
Do you see the danger of fast-promotion by a person who doesn't understand they're being used?
Couey deserves credit for taking a step with the infectious clones hypothesis. But he is a poor logician and weak on experimental design. I tried to approach these weaknesses with kids gloves, trying to get him to write so that the words would reflect back the need to cover divergences in logic that he wasn't yet handling (and that we're now rushing past in a way that will keep us from understanding the need to protect our supply chains in a new way).
Think about it: Israel just showed with the pager attacks that supply chain vulnerability is the new key to global blackmail. Work backward from there. Andrew Huff, supposed EcoHealth whistleblower, was an expert in what? Supply chain sabotage.
How do you pinpoint a first wave to the Northeast? Oh, those people are vastly more susceptible to psychosomatic programming? Nonsense.
"I will also put on the record that he has never (!) tried to get me to change my focus."
But he confused you into thinking that he had it worked out without even seeking the data that would falsify the branch of the theory being promoted.
We are not likely to ever again seen the form of fake pandemic that just took place. The illusionists recognize how much better prepared we are. What we need is to focus on the network that performs the illusions, and what levers they have occult control over.
I have seen every show for a couple years. Given the circumstance and the many many liars in the ridiculously phony 'resistance', its really not hard look past some of his frustrated comments, it makes him real, and correct or not, they matter little next to the bigger lies of virology he so skillfully articulates. Be a bigger man Mr Crawford.
My work is encompassing of the pandemic illusion, and if you're going to play a game of "It's infinity vs. nothing," then you're not really capable of conversation.
"Mass Murdering Morons" (tm). "Plannedemic" (tm). "Scamdemic" (tm). "Stooges for the New World Order" (tm), "BAAL Gates"... Dopes, idiots, morons... I could produce a whole new language describing these people.
Even if he's wrong about almost everything, he's right to insist we remember and analyze what happened in 2020.
I'm going to be brutally honest here, a lot of the MFM has come across like a movement more interested in upper class concerns than actually striking at the root of these abuses.
Dr Couey is one of the very few voices that actually has a focus on how everyone can be liberated from this nonsense and I admire him for that.
Edit: Dr Couey is absolutely wrong about Mathew Crawford for starters. And has attacked others in ways I know to be false.
Excellent article Uwe. I believe JJ is right and what he has been saying is indeed crucial for the future of Humanity.
There are so many pieces to the plandemic puzzle, that it behooves everybody who cares to listen to JJ. If he is right then everything we thought we knew is out the door.
As a casual observer of the human condition, and the medical freedom movement (or whatever moniker you choose), I try to not take sides. I first came to watch one of JJ Couey's shows two maybe three years ago. I found him to be intelligent. End of compliments. I observed what I thought was arrogance and super ego. He appeared to be acting, shall I say, superior to his audience. Whatever his information, right or wrong, is sidelined by a miserable personality. The second time I watched him, I was forced to stop after several minutes. He appears to have a social problem, especially when others disagree. He does not seem to have the ability to get along with others. He creates friction, and there's enough of that in the world.
I'm still not seeing how you have the more superior personality.
Thanks for the scooby snack : )
In the first few seconds, Nass mentions the “genome”. Of course the problem for her is that she does not understand, or refuses to admit, that the specimen sequenced is never pure.
Sounds to me like JJ is finally ready to endorse the “virus challenge”. We all welcome JJ when he is ready.
https://drsambailey.com/resources/settling-the-virus-debate/
JJ's larger problem is not merely "language", but in a nasty level of politics. After I promoted him, funded him, and helped him get his message out, he began making up stories about me that were either against any evidence, fabricated, or the result of his own actions. He then began to demand that people disassociate with me based on these stories. For instance, he put me on the wall of shame, saying that I came into the pushback against vaccines "too late for it to matter" when I was writing warnings in 2020, and was possibly the first person (all the way back in February 2021) to put together data and publicly say, "These [things] don't work, and the nations using them more are suffering more."
Why attack somebody like that? It is dishonest, and discredits his high fidelity persona. He even insuates, with no evidence, that I'm involved in money laundering. That's false, and there will never be evidence beyond, "Since I got mad at him, any business he runs must be dirty money." That's disturbing and clearly unethical to toss that in my direction, particularly when the only reason I considered building a new business was to fund him specifically (along with other content producers like Liam Sturgess, Tonika Todorova, and Gabe Wilson). Now it's a tiny company with very little flow (I have no time for it, at least partially due to JJ). No community that tolerates that sort of "burn it all down" quasi-rumor-slander mill will ever succeed, which should be obvious to anyone with basic social sense who has committed the sacrifice to build businesses or other organizations.
Why is he even building a persona? He has a quality theory that needs investigation. Such investigation might involve data mining or mapping. Is there some way we might tell if sequences in databases are real or modeled, and then identify which ones are clones? Instead, he says he was given a mission by God, and repeats his idea like the theory is a TED Talk development mission instead of an invitation for investigation. Coupled with his wild swinging (I do agree with him on some of his identifications of chaos agents, but he should distinguish between questions and accusations focusing on the web of players that have substantial money and organization pushing their interests), this makes him look somewhat crazy to some people. Somebody who can't tell the difference between a small business with a personal $32k investment, still looking to profit, and a $100 million investment scheme run by a con artist who told his followers to sell Pfizer at the market bottom [again] is somebody who can't see straight, and their messianic claims look increasingly like the product of an unstable mind.
He insists repeatedly that I'm "on Team Malone", based on having met the man twice, including having lunch with him at CHD. But I wasn't planning on going to CHD, then made plans to meet JJ there right before the event, not knowing who would be in attendance. JJ was encouraging me to stay close to Malone (have Malone on my podcast, which I was uncomfortable with), and I wanted to understand why Malone would not support the work he asked me to do on the military health database. I came to consider Malone's silence and gaslighting to be treasonous, which I haven't hesitated to say in print and in voice.
JJ now publicly mocks the abuse I went through as a child growing up in a cult over which there is now a noteworthy trial (thankfully) progressing. Somebody who will turn on those who helped them so viciously cannot lead until they've solved the internal problem that leads to their own dishonesty and cruelty. The only way such a person can lead is as an authoritarian cult leader. Everyone who wants to avoid being flamed down will stop participating as an independent mind, and that kills the value of scientific collaboration.
JJ's promotion of the notion that infectious clones can provide a magic trick is important, and it's a shame there aren't more people promoting it. At the same time, he should be clearly rebuked by a community for deranged attacks without evidence that only circularly fit a model. That's unscientific thinking, and causes breakdowns in communication. Nobody has written about his theory more often than I have, but now fewer people will be pointed to the explanations.
JJ should also be more willing to take criticism and advice. It is highly unusual for a 50-year-old to have such resistance to putting his ideas into words. I could tell that he was overconfident in his writing and resisting the chore, so I privately offered to help him write a book. I put together a shared document where we could work, and began setting up a framework. He never showed up for the task of just drafting an outline. It was also hard to get him to do basic things to help him self-fund, but that is not atypical of people who have been trapped in the academic mindset for a number of years. He makes himself difficult to coach by even the most charitable approach.
Should we even leave the infectious clones model in his hands?
At this point, I do not think so. But that nobody else is picking up that ball tells us the sad story that the dissident movement is largely a political disaster. This weekend's Rescue the Republic was indicative of that. It looked pathetic, to be frank. And it involved people like Malone, Johnson, and Kory, who are more and less responsible for the fact that incorrect data dominated the discussion of the military health database, when the corrected data I prepared would have been (a) useful, and (b) more persuasive in bringing people to our side. Russell Brand? What warped universe did we enter?
The dissident movement is weakening due to its domination by bad actors who just need your $30 million to build a hospital system...ooops, money gone, or your $100 million for a hedge fund, or mix good data with batcov insane data, then cross-promote. Also, they need your time to watch these 43 hours of alien contact videos.
What we needed was to network the rest of us (outside the big money and influence steering some obvious names and personalities) so that we weren't paved over. JJ's actions narrow the messengers and community to such a small pool while attacking all else that it is obviously doomed to fail. I have numerous friends in science whom I was working to nudge into the dissident movement who have kept silent at least partially due to watching the way JJ treated me and others. These aren't irreversible problems, but they aren't likely to be fixed, in my estimation.
I have been following nearly every show of his for the past year and a half. I have never heard him level these kind of accusations against you. I have also never seen him engage in „politics“. He is straightforward as far as I am concerned. And he his hurt.
The main point is that his message is one which is important, that being „RNA can not pandemic“. How would you model that with data? I see very few people who make that point, which from a legal and political perspective is the key to the whole pandemic preparedness scare. Which is why I will keep supporting him.
JJ knows that I appreciate your work, and share it. He has never been „political“ about it to me.
Therefore your lengthy comment seems somewhat „political“ to me.
That’s right, “ rna cannot pandemic.” If anything can pandemic” we all would like to see scientific evidence. As for now, there’s apparently no scientific evidence that contagion is a true phenomenon.
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/cdc-cant-find-any-studies-demonstrating-contagion-of-colds-flu-fake-covid-because-they-dont-exist/
Some of his attacks on me are veiled. He did put me on his wall of shame one time. I sent him a screenshot of me warning people in 2020. Since I had to threaten to sue him over lies, he started explaining things about me without mentioning my name sometimes. But he has a private chat where he and Mark regularly attack me, and details are discussed there.
If you watched his shows, you may have seen the one where Kevin Barret interviews Malone and Rose. Just the mention of my name causes JJ to stop and act as if that's an indication of wrongdoing. All I had said was that VAERS data was a safety signal, but isn't useful for mortality estimates.
In the context of what we are up against, Dr. Couey is one of very, very few scientists who is raising essentially critical doubts over a planned scenario. There may come a time when your grievances can be addressed. At this point in time I would urge you to understand that, unless you challenge his core points in a meaningful way, it is the honorable and right thing to throw your clout behind the things that really matter now. And that is the question of RNA pandemics as a general danger.
I recommend you watch Dr. Couey‘s recent presentation at Doctor for Covid Ethics International. Here: https://stream.gigaohm.bio/w/f4CTAcYmJkkbjWyYc9TwNb?start=8m53s
I have watched many of Couey's presentations, and contributed to many of them. Many of his talking points came from me, though I am certain he will now deny that (in some cases, I have transcripts saved).
"We should be okay with fanatical slanderers claiming to be missionaries from god ascending to leadership, if the ends justify the means."
How many times in history were those famous last words?
In the meantime, I'm one of the few people left investigating the likely poisoning of people that was part of the pandemic illusion. I'm the only person promoting the correct military health data that solves a lot of the debates quickly. I'm one of the only people tracking players through the occult networks/circles that have not just one illusion (pandemics) in its arsenal, but many. So, here we are, and you know what his work is. Do you know mine, which is encompassing, and aims at the root?
"There are no means by which I can hold somebody accountable."
This is a nihilistic response, and it rarely leads anywhere good.
What is the purpose of the quotes in your comment? Are you putting words in my mouth?
This article was not about your contribution. You will notice that your substack is one of a handful which I recommend. So there is no question of respect.
If you watch the discussion of last nights presentation at Doctor for Covid Ethics International you will notice that I have also pointed out that the pandemic scare is indeed but one of many games the occult oligarchy is playing and that we have „Freedom Fighters“ who need to answer about their involvement in such cults. Reiner Fuellmich is a case in point, and my articles about him and Scientology draw from your work (which is referenced in my articles).
But please understand that as far as the pandemic potential scare is concerned Dr Couey is leading the way. And I will continue to point out the importance of that aspect, as I will also put on the record that he has never (!) tried to get me to change my focus. I do notice that exactly this is what has been tried from various sides with respect of my articles about Couey‘s work.
"What is the purpose of the quotes in your comment? Are you putting words in my mouth?"
I'm telling you how I follow the implications of your words.
"This article was not about your contribution. You will notice that your substack is one of a handful which I recommend. So there is no question of respect."
I'm not sure what this has to do with the conversation, which I'm guessing is the result of a cognitive hiccup.
"But please understand that as far as the pandemic potential scare is concerned Dr Couey is leading the way."
I strongly disagree. He is leading a firm conclusion without experiment and dodges the question of whether there was poisoning or supply chain sabotage. I believe that he is being used by military intelligence, whom I believe his friend Mark works for. I believe the people Mark answers to were behind the destruction of my home and the attempt of my life (and my wife's) two years ago.
I think that JJ is now being helped by a digital army that stalks me and pushes out the slander aimed at me because I'm the only person pointing out a set of facts that contradicts the version of Couey's theory that is being primarily promoted.
Do you see the danger of fast-promotion by a person who doesn't understand they're being used?
Couey deserves credit for taking a step with the infectious clones hypothesis. But he is a poor logician and weak on experimental design. I tried to approach these weaknesses with kids gloves, trying to get him to write so that the words would reflect back the need to cover divergences in logic that he wasn't yet handling (and that we're now rushing past in a way that will keep us from understanding the need to protect our supply chains in a new way).
Think about it: Israel just showed with the pager attacks that supply chain vulnerability is the new key to global blackmail. Work backward from there. Andrew Huff, supposed EcoHealth whistleblower, was an expert in what? Supply chain sabotage.
How do you pinpoint a first wave to the Northeast? Oh, those people are vastly more susceptible to psychosomatic programming? Nonsense.
"I will also put on the record that he has never (!) tried to get me to change my focus."
But he confused you into thinking that he had it worked out without even seeking the data that would falsify the branch of the theory being promoted.
We are not likely to ever again seen the form of fake pandemic that just took place. The illusionists recognize how much better prepared we are. What we need is to focus on the network that performs the illusions, and what levers they have occult control over.
I have seen every show for a couple years. Given the circumstance and the many many liars in the ridiculously phony 'resistance', its really not hard look past some of his frustrated comments, it makes him real, and correct or not, they matter little next to the bigger lies of virology he so skillfully articulates. Be a bigger man Mr Crawford.
When people slander you and accuse you of murder, calling that out is being...small?
No, making false accusations is meaningful. Attacking somebody's livelihood, and mocking child abuse is meaningful.
If you're going to defend those behaviors, have the courage to do it with your whole name.
in the context of the >60 year lie of virology and billions of people getting accustomed to regular transfection, yes its very small.
My work is encompassing of the pandemic illusion, and if you're going to play a game of "It's infinity vs. nothing," then you're not really capable of conversation.
Since you're always capable of conversation can you then show us your detailed write up on the high flow oxygen poisonings/murders?
"If you haven't written on everything, you must be bad man."
"Mass Murdering Morons" (tm). "Plannedemic" (tm). "Scamdemic" (tm). "Stooges for the New World Order" (tm), "BAAL Gates"... Dopes, idiots, morons... I could produce a whole new language describing these people.