In order to solve a problem, it needs a complete understanding of all previous knowledge. Which is impossible to obtain unless past doctrine is revisited & reformed. Kudos to JJ Couey and Mark Kulacz
Thanks Uwe for confirming what I very intuitively believe about JJ Couey. He is very sincere, believeable and knowlegable. He really cares about the future of all the generations to follow us.
I would recommend looking into Joe Marshall's work on Lyndon H. LaRouche. Medical freedom isn't the only misdirection effort and should be now expected as inevitable/routine.
I have. During a four-hour drive I have listened to his first two pieces.
I will say this: he is founding much of his argument on sources who are close to a certain Heinz Alfred K with some resemblance to the picture you are carrying in your profile. I wonder …
He is using very little original sources. As a historian, I can only reiterate the need to go „ad fontes“, rather than rely on second hand information.
He has not read Plato (at least is his representation of Plato deeply misguided), and his understanding of Schiller is poor, to say the least.
Having said that: I know that JJ Couey recommends Joe, which is why I will not pass a judgement on that four hours of study.
There is a lot to be critical of with the LaRouche Movement (not just that his widow bought into the pandemic). I am not advocating LaRouche per se. What I have come to appreciate is the transparency of the sources on which LaRouche builds his position. The quality of most of the material (especially History, Philosophy and Science) is exceptional.
Matt Ehret and Cythia Chung I respect as much as I respect JJ. I have not taken the bait to get me off of following Jay (as some have tried). I will not take Joe‘s bait to get me off of following Matt, Cynthia and the RTF. Instead I urge everyone to resist any impulse to take Joe‘s word for granted and make up their own minds!
I was a real fan of Matt and Cynthia's work. Have bought their books for friends and family. Am a big fan of EIR too. Have spent countless hours reading back issues. And I am a massive fan of Jay's. Very few people have courage like he has. His perspective is so piercing, so thorough, so difficult to dismiss, its been such a shame to see Matt and Cynthia pass him by. If it's really about winning and awakening, I don't understand them.
Thank you Uwe! I too value the work of both Couey and Kulacz. There are few voices that can untangle the biology and the historic context. Ehret and Chung certainly have the global picture in hand as well. James Delingpole intuitively understands a fair bit. For critical thinking and a philosophical analysis I would laud both Peter Duke of the Duke Report and Courtenay Turner.
You are being disingenious, again! I will block you from further comments if you keep gaslighting people further! Stop it!
Mark Kulacz did NOT say that Mengeles notebooks were indeed kept at the Vatican! Go to 01:27:00 in this video and see for yourself! https://old.bitchute.com/video/A0qtvqVRnMsS/
He indeed told his audience that the Elsevier article by Musiol exposed the fraud, and he also has uploaded the article which you claim to have secured. You are making a fuss!
MArk Kulacs has shown that the Vatican did help Nazis escape, including Mengele. And he speculated about the high number of people connected to genetic research and the Vatican.
The story of Mengele's notebooks being "lost" is very probably a cover. In the same way it would be plausible why Elsevier (a science publisher controlled by the dutch Oligarchy!) would carry the fake Mengele story in order to help people like you obscure the work of researchers like Mark Kulacs by insinuating lies! The Elsevier paper is no proof that Mengele's papers are NOT in the Vatican. We don't know. Mark Kulaczs has hypothesized (01:37:00) that there is some probability to assume the Mengele papers being kept in the Vatican, and used by a larger number of people who are involved in the "Biosecurity/Gentechnology" scare.
Stop it! The date of the video is included in the recording. „Versions“ are edited to cut out glitches, not change content. If different content is created, he will do another „episode“.
He has hypothesised that the Vatican might be in possession of these and other relevant sources to the genetic programme. It is an entirely plausible hypothesis, given all the other data points that have surfaced since - which are also stated in the video.
You are out on a limb when you say Mengele was a nobody! What are your sources for that? That Mengele did not act alone, is something which Kulaczs points out as well. But that he conducted experiments and reported about it is a well established fact.
Go and discuss the general issue: why is it that the Vatican should endorse such a horrific programme as the genetic injection of healthy human beings? Why all those „coincidences“, e.g. Bill Barr‘s brother being in charge of the association of Catholic Scientists? The Koprowski lead? The 1962 discussions at the CIBA conference in which so many other „players“ are implicated? What did Malone have to discuss with Cardinal Turkson? These are the questions which cry for an answer. A fool who believes in so many coincidences!
Thanks Uwe for confirming what I very intuitively believe about JJ Couey. He is very sincere, believeable and knowlegable. He really cares about the future of all the generations to follow us.
https://controlstudies.substack.com/p/the-dna-hoax-0a2
DNA is the pipe dream of eugenicists who obsess over control over life.
It's failed over and over...
Quantum theory and special relativity are also broken pseudoscience like genetics and virology.
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLkdAkAC4ItcFyNFBywN0wiZ45pCnMr-Ay
I would recommend looking into Joe Marshall's work on Lyndon H. LaRouche. Medical freedom isn't the only misdirection effort and should be now expected as inevitable/routine.
https://rumble.com/v61uro2-twist-of-conspiracy-misdirection-series-introduction-tea-party-vs-the-ghost.html
I have. During a four-hour drive I have listened to his first two pieces.
I will say this: he is founding much of his argument on sources who are close to a certain Heinz Alfred K with some resemblance to the picture you are carrying in your profile. I wonder …
He is using very little original sources. As a historian, I can only reiterate the need to go „ad fontes“, rather than rely on second hand information.
He has not read Plato (at least is his representation of Plato deeply misguided), and his understanding of Schiller is poor, to say the least.
Having said that: I know that JJ Couey recommends Joe, which is why I will not pass a judgement on that four hours of study.
There is a lot to be critical of with the LaRouche Movement (not just that his widow bought into the pandemic). I am not advocating LaRouche per se. What I have come to appreciate is the transparency of the sources on which LaRouche builds his position. The quality of most of the material (especially History, Philosophy and Science) is exceptional.
Matt Ehret and Cythia Chung I respect as much as I respect JJ. I have not taken the bait to get me off of following Jay (as some have tried). I will not take Joe‘s bait to get me off of following Matt, Cynthia and the RTF. Instead I urge everyone to resist any impulse to take Joe‘s word for granted and make up their own minds!
I was a real fan of Matt and Cynthia's work. Have bought their books for friends and family. Am a big fan of EIR too. Have spent countless hours reading back issues. And I am a massive fan of Jay's. Very few people have courage like he has. His perspective is so piercing, so thorough, so difficult to dismiss, its been such a shame to see Matt and Cynthia pass him by. If it's really about winning and awakening, I don't understand them.
Thanks for offering a different perspective. We all should be open to looking at different perspectives and questioning our own belief systems.
Thank you Uwe! I too value the work of both Couey and Kulacz. There are few voices that can untangle the biology and the historic context. Ehret and Chung certainly have the global picture in hand as well. James Delingpole intuitively understands a fair bit. For critical thinking and a philosophical analysis I would laud both Peter Duke of the Duke Report and Courtenay Turner.
You are being disingenious, again! I will block you from further comments if you keep gaslighting people further! Stop it!
Mark Kulacz did NOT say that Mengeles notebooks were indeed kept at the Vatican! Go to 01:27:00 in this video and see for yourself! https://old.bitchute.com/video/A0qtvqVRnMsS/
He indeed told his audience that the Elsevier article by Musiol exposed the fraud, and he also has uploaded the article which you claim to have secured. You are making a fuss!
MArk Kulacs has shown that the Vatican did help Nazis escape, including Mengele. And he speculated about the high number of people connected to genetic research and the Vatican.
The story of Mengele's notebooks being "lost" is very probably a cover. In the same way it would be plausible why Elsevier (a science publisher controlled by the dutch Oligarchy!) would carry the fake Mengele story in order to help people like you obscure the work of researchers like Mark Kulacs by insinuating lies! The Elsevier paper is no proof that Mengele's papers are NOT in the Vatican. We don't know. Mark Kulaczs has hypothesized (01:37:00) that there is some probability to assume the Mengele papers being kept in the Vatican, and used by a larger number of people who are involved in the "Biosecurity/Gentechnology" scare.
Stop it! The date of the video is included in the recording. „Versions“ are edited to cut out glitches, not change content. If different content is created, he will do another „episode“.
He has hypothesised that the Vatican might be in possession of these and other relevant sources to the genetic programme. It is an entirely plausible hypothesis, given all the other data points that have surfaced since - which are also stated in the video.
You are out on a limb when you say Mengele was a nobody! What are your sources for that? That Mengele did not act alone, is something which Kulaczs points out as well. But that he conducted experiments and reported about it is a well established fact.
Go and discuss the general issue: why is it that the Vatican should endorse such a horrific programme as the genetic injection of healthy human beings? Why all those „coincidences“, e.g. Bill Barr‘s brother being in charge of the association of Catholic Scientists? The Koprowski lead? The 1962 discussions at the CIBA conference in which so many other „players“ are implicated? What did Malone have to discuss with Cardinal Turkson? These are the questions which cry for an answer. A fool who believes in so many coincidences!