A "scientific elite" has been on the record about how to take over control of the world. For them to succeed, we need to accept that Snow is black, Viruses cause disease and Fuellmich is a hero
This to JJ Couey, in relation to that lengthy clip from Gigaohm Biological. I take exception to being included in your photomontage of alleged crooks.
Cheers, JJ, for throwing me in with the crooks. I’m not part of anything.
It’s year six, and I cannot be bothered with attempted rebuttals.
People will have made up their minds, anyway.
I say again, I have never sought to get people to “believe me”. That way requires trust in other people who you don’t know, and that’s really dangerous. All I want is to have provided enough evidence & information on the basis of which YOU decide what you think. Serious crooks are engaged in taking over everything, for malign purposes. Nobody is coming to save us, but we can save ourselves individually and thereby collectively, mostly by doing nothing more than withdrawing our consent. That & some preparation for probable further assaults.
By the way, a comment. Lots of us, some with backgrounds in addressing large & diverse audiences and others with nothing more than an ability to communicate with smaller, often specialist groups, have been busy for several years. Only you have developed a visual & audio style of presenting that looks to me, someone who knows nothing of TV work, like a highly produced end product. Was this an interest of yours before the nonsense began? If not, why do you think only you present in this manner? I find it very watchable, but I reflect on how unable I would be to do anything like this.
You also use terms, not all of which even I understand, despite having been a professional research scientist for over 30 years. I choose to make things simple, where I can, in part on good advice from my wife, who points out that I’ll otherwise confuse more people than I’ll bring along with me. If you go over the head of an audience, you require them to choose either to be confused about what you’re saying or to trust you. If it’s absolutely essential to your point to bring in complex ideas and information, I would urge that you also explain in simpler terms what you mean.
JJ has called everyone a traitor, Mike. Even chosen favourites like Denis Rancourt and at one point, Housatonic. I remarked to him that even Mike Yeadon would eventually cop it, and so you have.
The trouble with putting yourself constantly out there, is that you become a target, and unless you have the hide of a politician, you take constant bruising.
I've said it before, "every writer shows themselves completely in their style" (Burroughs). This is not a trivial observation. Your style is a model of its kind, of which you can be justifiably proud.
Your opinion on no proof for infection may be subjectively understandable (and who would not like this idea?), it doesn't match with the experience of many, though.
Infection, symptoms, antibodies, antigene tests, pcr, electron microscopy seem to speak a different language.
Everyone can appreciate how hard it is to admit to mistakes when we stood firm for them. That is true for all sides, and for all of us.
Best would be to just keep on finding the truth and become ever more reasonable taking all causes and reasons into account.
Thank you, Uwe, for this excellent article. We’re at a point where personally I no longer give my trust to anyone. Only myself and my wife. Literally nobody else.
I'm sorry to hear that, Mike, but I also understand. FWIW, the folks who pay attention and who I stay in contact with, unanimously see you as a beacon of integrity. Genuinely grateful for all you've done and continue to do.
The reason is that I realized he was doing pro-wrestling entertainment with all this very important topic of democide. And he also started with personal attacks against people who have not done anything wrong. It seems like a pretend paranoia is part of the show. So, JJ Couey is irrelevant for me. As others who do the same.
I'm not following the covid democide for the entertainment value. I'm old enough to entertain myself. I follow this story because justice is important. Sadly, other people are obsessed with their own sense of self-importance. It's better to disengage from such crowds.
I must say it is bizarre in the extreme that JJ puts @Dr Mike Yeadon in his photo.
I can’t think of anyone less ‘on the stage together’ than Mike.
At the start, everyone of any nouse and responsibility did anything possible to spread information.
It was Mike at the first Doctor’s for Covid Ethics Symposium that established for me a need to pay proper attention
I maintain that it is a sign of real blindness not to see clearly the obvious integrity of Mike Yeadon.
In hardly any time at all Mike quickly realised the peculiarities in the ‘freedom movement’
His appearances stopped. He did the occasional Zoom or Video contribution but has become - as many of us have - deeply suspicious of the steering towards this and away from that, and the real nature of various heroes.
I have mediated many requests for Mike to be a talking head and he always refuses. Media twists. Alternative Media is not always what it seems.
He will talk to real people like the amazing Sheep Farm boys and Geoff buys Cars.
The three or four times videos were supplied to parliamentary meetings in different countries including the UK, ‘technical difficulties’ stopped Mike’s calmly delivered over-the-target warnings being heard where the Doc Martens got to present their dramatic presentations.
In a recent interview between Neil Oliver and Ed Dowd they said openly that Mike had been deliberately sidelined by the ‘Truth movement’ leaders ‘because he sounded too extreme’ but that ‘it seems he was right all along’
!
Actions like this of JJ Coueys completely exacerbate the problem.
I maintain that it takes such blindness not to spot Mike’s obvious integrity and lack of artifice that it brings into question the awareness or motives of the attacker.
I am prepared to put it down to paranoia on his part: an over-extended version of Mike’s own doubts about the ‘movement’ and its major voices.
I know of several voices I trust.
How?
Because people cannot act relaxed natural open, honest lack of artifice behaviour.
Everything RM says comes from behind a walled room at the top of a tall tower.
You want to wave your hands in front of his face and say ‘hello?’
Can you glimpse their soul?
If you can’t that is not proof of someone’s malfeasance. People are damaged.
But if you can then this is a huge green flag.
If someone cannot see the pain, earnestness, frustration, open desire to reach minds - for the expressed desire of stopping this juggernaut in every phrase Mike Yeadon utters then my assessment of their character is affected.
Blind or false - everything they say needs more than the usual pinch of salt.
I must say it is bizarre in the extreme that JJ puts @Dr Mike Yeadon in his photo.
I can’t think of anyone less ‘on the stage together’ than Mike.
At the start, everyone of any nouse and responsibility did anything possible to spread information.
It was Mike at the first Doctor’s for Covid Ethics Symposium that established for me a need to pay proper attention
I maintain that it is a sign of real blindness not to see clearly the obvious integrity of Mike Yeadon.
In hardly any time at all Mike quickly realised the peculiarities in the ‘freedom movement’
His appearances stopped. He did the occasional Zoom or Video contribution but has become - as many of us have - deeply suspicious of the steering towards this and away from that, and the real nature of various heroes.
I have mediated many requests for Mike to be a talking head and he always refuses. Media twists. Alternative Media is not always what it seems.
He will talk to real people like the amazing Sheep Farm boys and Geoff buys Cars.
The three or four times videos were supplied to parliamentary meetings in different countries including the UK, ‘technical difficulties’ stopped Mike’s calmly delivered over-the-target warnings being heard where the Doc Martens got to present their dramatic presentations.
In a recent interview between Neil Oliver and Ed Dowd they said openly that Mike had been deliberately sidelined by the ‘Truth movement’ leaders ‘because he sounded too extreme’ but that ‘it seems he was right all along’
!
Actions like this of JJ Coueys completely exacerbate the problem.
I maintain that it takes such blindness not to spot Mike’s obvious integrity and lack of artifice that it brings into question the awareness or motives of the attacker.
I am prepared to put it down to paranoia on his part: an over-extended version of Mike’s own doubts about the ‘movement’ and its major voices.
I know of several voices I trust.
How?
Because people cannot act relaxed natural open, honest lack of artifice behaviour.
Everything RM says comes from behind a walled room at the top of a tall tower.
You want to wave your hands in front of his face and say ‘hello?’
Can you glimpse their soul?
If you can’t that is not proof of someone’s malfeasance. People are damaged.
But if you can then this is a huge green flag.
If someone cannot see the pain, earnestness, frustration, open desire to reach minds - for the expressed desire of stopping this juggernaut in every phrase Mike Yeadon utters then my assessment of their character is affected.
Blind or false - everything they say needs more than the usual pinch of salt.
"I maintain that it is a sign of real blindness not to see clearly the obvious integrity of Mike Yeadon."
I completely agree though have come to the reluctant realization that spotting integrity - which is more intuitive or gut-level knowing, than a mental function - has been dismantled for many.
I'm not sure why some have escaped that but I do know the more we value our selves as individuals who must choose and decide for ourselves, the stronger that natural ability to grok integrity gets.
Mike has always been a shining example of human integrity.
I've appreciated JJ's insights in the past (though have not listened to him in many months) this is disappointing.
No. “RNA can’t pandemic” is simply just a nonsense statement probably designed to by-pass any critical thinking on the part of the repeater in order to give birth to yet another distracting and meaningless trope.
The system uses or tolerates supposed "heroes" in the public forum as long as they serve the agenda. They are allowed to argue and conflict with each other but always must be tightly controlled by the system and above all not challenge it. Anyone outside of this like Dr Couey are silenced and suppressed, we live in a world of unbending, unyielding theatre.
Excellent insights, rare even for general, alternative truth seekers. Especially this part and following about how groups are taken over without anyone's noticing:
" Together with the huge number of False-Flag-Operations conducted throughout history, the fact that subverting the opposition from within has been applied especially by oligarchical operations should make us weary of “unity” being the most prominent virtue to observe in the fight for freedom. In fact, to establish a desire for unity within a group is the most powerful weapon for any one power wishing to destroy that group — provided the infiltration of agents of influence beholden to the aggressor has been accomplished first. It is very easy for such agents to act presidential, stay aloof, and give a bad name to those who ask questions about the integrity of prominent figures or organisations. "
Thanks Uwe for continuing to expose the the involvement of crypto-Scientologists in the Health Freedom movement!
Crypto-Scientologists are very much involved in the alt health and Medical Freedom movements. They run influence campaigns and employ false front NGO's. In the 1980's Hubbard charged his followers to make "detoxing" as popular as jogging: “FASE was originally created to put Scientology covertly into schools and government, to give the Purification Rundown an air of respectability,”
The "autism epidemic" narrative has been tremendously helpful to them in furthering their Purif Rundown "tech" amongst the general population. Crypto-Scientologists have been involved in the autism treatment marketplace, which is why I have such an interest in their doings.
Their aim, of course, is to replace the Western model of health and medicine with their own, which is to say, that all our diseases are caused by contaminating Body Thetans, which are the fragments of traumatised alien souls: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body_thetan
Michael Baum (of Baum Hedlund et al) was an unindicted co-conspirator in Operation Snow White:
"Mr. Baum burglarized the Interpol Liaison Office at the Justice Department on at least three occasions. Those raids netted some three feet of copies of Interpol documents
Baum is a former staffer of C0$'s Guardian Office (their secret service) and was Baum Hedlund’s managing partner until Scientologist Brent Wisner took over.
Baum Hedlund et al attorney Brent Wisner filed the first autism baby food lawsuit in California against several companies, alleging a child was diagnosed w/ autism after eating baby foods tainted w/ mercury and heavy metals:
Andrew Kaufman rightly asserts a control establishes if the alleged virus (introduced) is actually present at all. Sure, bacteriophages, cytopathic activity etc. are deliberately misinterpreted. As an example, consider the creation v. evolution argument. Most concious beings would agree that for anything to evolve, it has to exist first. So, as Kaufman suggests, lets use control experiments to establish the existence of the said "virus", "bacteriophage activity", "cytopathic activity",'Santa Claus" whatever you want to interpret it as. Once its existence is established we can then apply Koch's postulates to determine replication, contagion, and so on. Let us not be distracted from the issue of "virus" existence.
A non sequitur. Again, establish the existence or non existence of said virus, specifically produce evidence of COVID19, a replication competent obligate intra-cellular parasite. For 5 years now, $1M has been on offer if anybody can. Until reality is allowed a look in, everything else is theatre.
Not at all. You are diverting, for the "issue" of "isolation" is - very likely - a deliberate ploy to keep everyone going round in circles. That is what Couey shows quite successfully! First of all: "virus" is in effect an evolution from what has been studied as "phages" for decades, and which has been completely left out by either side, "pandemicists" as well as "no-virus"-protagonists.
From your alias, I am assuming that you too seem to belong to an aristotelean "either - or" faction. But contemplate the option that both can be right, and both can be wrong, at the same time. A thing can be "A" and "Not-A" at the same time! Which would seem a paradox. But it is through examining paradoxa (go beyond that what is to be expected) that we gain knowledge of a new quality. Parallel lines do not intersect, right? Right in Euclidian geometry, but wrong in Gaussian geometry. Gauss was a platonist. He hypothesized the Higher Hypothesis. Go and study Couey's Biology 101
So you decide whether I deserve to be listened to? You produce other evidence than "hearsay"? I am not producing any evidence at all. Never said I would. All I said is:
"But contemplate the option that both can be right, and both can be wrong, at the same time. A thing can be "A" and "Not-A" at the same time!"
Couey, in fact, seems to imply that any insistence on "evidence for virus" is a distraction. He has evolved his position, challenging any of his critics to debate him. Kaufmann (and other no-virus campers) apparently demanded he subscribe to their position first, or "produce papers". Which they could easily disprove by debating him. But, they are not. Hmmm. Wonder why...
As for the "interaction" between you and me here, given the kind of responses you are issuing, frankly, I've had enough. Go, and have your "discussions" elsewhere.
This piece was not about Fuellmich. There is a whole series about him and the oddities. As for judging: I am much more in favor of asking questions. People should come to their own conclusion.
Isn't that like saying things like "No cure for stupid" and "Stupudity must be contagious, at least among the polity."
Scurvy seems contagious until Limeys get their healing limes.
Blueberries are apparently more intelligent than oncologists. Blueberries provide you with cheap delicious and nutricious anti-angiogenesis enzymes that let you prevent a cancerous clump of cells from developing its own blood supply and becoming a tumor. For some strange reason my health insurance doesn't cover blueberries.
Uh oh. I have a bad bad case of acne so everybody says I should go to this professional with a flame thrower because his methods eliminate acne 100% of the time. Of course some of the M.E.'s will write in "acne" as cause of death, but we know they are lying bastards anyway.
I can't argue with everybody but I can make sense of things myself. I can maintain my crap detector and use it often.
Good luck. Remember. Like I've told my daughters concerning potential boyfriends: Some guys are from Jupiter, it's just poetic justice.
It was quite obvious early on that "Nuremberg 2.0" was a ruse. I was not surprised when the Corona Investigative Committee imploded.
What happened to the substantial funds gathered from donations? Some of it was invested in gold, which has gone up substantially. Others of it was used to pay for building works on a house that Fuellmich and his wife owned and then sold at a profit.
Neither of these seems to be legal or ethical uses of charitable donations.
Now Fuellmich's wife is requesting further financial support from Mexico. You can even make the payment in crypto, even though everyone knows that this is the slick slope to the CBDC financial gulag.
This to JJ Couey, in relation to that lengthy clip from Gigaohm Biological. I take exception to being included in your photomontage of alleged crooks.
Cheers, JJ, for throwing me in with the crooks. I’m not part of anything.
It’s year six, and I cannot be bothered with attempted rebuttals.
People will have made up their minds, anyway.
I say again, I have never sought to get people to “believe me”. That way requires trust in other people who you don’t know, and that’s really dangerous. All I want is to have provided enough evidence & information on the basis of which YOU decide what you think. Serious crooks are engaged in taking over everything, for malign purposes. Nobody is coming to save us, but we can save ourselves individually and thereby collectively, mostly by doing nothing more than withdrawing our consent. That & some preparation for probable further assaults.
By the way, a comment. Lots of us, some with backgrounds in addressing large & diverse audiences and others with nothing more than an ability to communicate with smaller, often specialist groups, have been busy for several years. Only you have developed a visual & audio style of presenting that looks to me, someone who knows nothing of TV work, like a highly produced end product. Was this an interest of yours before the nonsense began? If not, why do you think only you present in this manner? I find it very watchable, but I reflect on how unable I would be to do anything like this.
You also use terms, not all of which even I understand, despite having been a professional research scientist for over 30 years. I choose to make things simple, where I can, in part on good advice from my wife, who points out that I’ll otherwise confuse more people than I’ll bring along with me. If you go over the head of an audience, you require them to choose either to be confused about what you’re saying or to trust you. If it’s absolutely essential to your point to bring in complex ideas and information, I would urge that you also explain in simpler terms what you mean.
JJ has called everyone a traitor, Mike. Even chosen favourites like Denis Rancourt and at one point, Housatonic. I remarked to him that even Mike Yeadon would eventually cop it, and so you have.
The trouble with putting yourself constantly out there, is that you become a target, and unless you have the hide of a politician, you take constant bruising.
I've said it before, "every writer shows themselves completely in their style" (Burroughs). This is not a trivial observation. Your style is a model of its kind, of which you can be justifiably proud.
JJ Couey ...
...."HEH EVERYBODY! ..I'M OVER HERE! ...EVERYBODY LISTEN TO ME!"
Why don't you ever do a write up about phages and how they are used in microbiology?
That would be a lot better than taking us around and around in circles arguing whether viruses exist or not.
Google & Godaddy is Censoring all 650+ posts on nurembergtrials.net. When you click on any link in Google, or on this site; except for direcly from the Blog; the page gets redirected to the homepage. Substack is also blocking all new posts. Visit this link for the Backup of 622 Blog Posts from 2021-2025 & Daily News 2019-2025 due to Google's removal of these pages and also disappearing them from the Internet Archive. https://nuremberg2.substack.com/p/nuremberg-20-backup-of-622-blog-posts https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-2-0/f/nuremberg-20-backup-of-622-blog-posts-from-2019-2025-censored
Your opinion on no proof for infection may be subjectively understandable (and who would not like this idea?), it doesn't match with the experience of many, though.
Infection, symptoms, antibodies, antigene tests, pcr, electron microscopy seem to speak a different language.
Everyone can appreciate how hard it is to admit to mistakes when we stood firm for them. That is true for all sides, and for all of us.
Best would be to just keep on finding the truth and become ever more reasonable taking all causes and reasons into account.
Thank you, Uwe, for this excellent article. We’re at a point where personally I no longer give my trust to anyone. Only myself and my wife. Literally nobody else.
I'm sorry to hear that, Mike, but I also understand. FWIW, the folks who pay attention and who I stay in contact with, unanimously see you as a beacon of integrity. Genuinely grateful for all you've done and continue to do.
I stopped watching JJ long ago.
The reason is that I realized he was doing pro-wrestling entertainment with all this very important topic of democide. And he also started with personal attacks against people who have not done anything wrong. It seems like a pretend paranoia is part of the show. So, JJ Couey is irrelevant for me. As others who do the same.
I'm not following the covid democide for the entertainment value. I'm old enough to entertain myself. I follow this story because justice is important. Sadly, other people are obsessed with their own sense of self-importance. It's better to disengage from such crowds.
Google & Godaddy is Censoring all 650+ posts on nurembergtrials.net. When you click on any link in Google, or on this site; except for direcly from the Blog; the page gets redirected to the homepage. Substack is also blocking all new posts. Visit this link for the Backup of 622 Blog Posts from 2021-2025 & Daily News 2019-2025 due to Google's removal of these pages and also disappearing them from the Internet Archive. https://nuremberg2.substack.com/p/nuremberg-20-backup-of-622-blog-posts https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-2-0/f/nuremberg-20-backup-of-622-blog-posts-from-2019-2025-censored
A great article.
I must say it is bizarre in the extreme that JJ puts @Dr Mike Yeadon in his photo.
I can’t think of anyone less ‘on the stage together’ than Mike.
At the start, everyone of any nouse and responsibility did anything possible to spread information.
It was Mike at the first Doctor’s for Covid Ethics Symposium that established for me a need to pay proper attention
I maintain that it is a sign of real blindness not to see clearly the obvious integrity of Mike Yeadon.
In hardly any time at all Mike quickly realised the peculiarities in the ‘freedom movement’
His appearances stopped. He did the occasional Zoom or Video contribution but has become - as many of us have - deeply suspicious of the steering towards this and away from that, and the real nature of various heroes.
I have mediated many requests for Mike to be a talking head and he always refuses. Media twists. Alternative Media is not always what it seems.
He will talk to real people like the amazing Sheep Farm boys and Geoff buys Cars.
The three or four times videos were supplied to parliamentary meetings in different countries including the UK, ‘technical difficulties’ stopped Mike’s calmly delivered over-the-target warnings being heard where the Doc Martens got to present their dramatic presentations.
In a recent interview between Neil Oliver and Ed Dowd they said openly that Mike had been deliberately sidelined by the ‘Truth movement’ leaders ‘because he sounded too extreme’ but that ‘it seems he was right all along’
!
Actions like this of JJ Coueys completely exacerbate the problem.
I maintain that it takes such blindness not to spot Mike’s obvious integrity and lack of artifice that it brings into question the awareness or motives of the attacker.
I am prepared to put it down to paranoia on his part: an over-extended version of Mike’s own doubts about the ‘movement’ and its major voices.
I know of several voices I trust.
How?
Because people cannot act relaxed natural open, honest lack of artifice behaviour.
Everything RM says comes from behind a walled room at the top of a tall tower.
You want to wave your hands in front of his face and say ‘hello?’
Can you glimpse their soul?
If you can’t that is not proof of someone’s malfeasance. People are damaged.
But if you can then this is a huge green flag.
If someone cannot see the pain, earnestness, frustration, open desire to reach minds - for the expressed desire of stopping this juggernaut in every phrase Mike Yeadon utters then my assessment of their character is affected.
Blind or false - everything they say needs more than the usual pinch of salt.
A great article.
I must say it is bizarre in the extreme that JJ puts @Dr Mike Yeadon in his photo.
I can’t think of anyone less ‘on the stage together’ than Mike.
At the start, everyone of any nouse and responsibility did anything possible to spread information.
It was Mike at the first Doctor’s for Covid Ethics Symposium that established for me a need to pay proper attention
I maintain that it is a sign of real blindness not to see clearly the obvious integrity of Mike Yeadon.
In hardly any time at all Mike quickly realised the peculiarities in the ‘freedom movement’
His appearances stopped. He did the occasional Zoom or Video contribution but has become - as many of us have - deeply suspicious of the steering towards this and away from that, and the real nature of various heroes.
I have mediated many requests for Mike to be a talking head and he always refuses. Media twists. Alternative Media is not always what it seems.
He will talk to real people like the amazing Sheep Farm boys and Geoff buys Cars.
The three or four times videos were supplied to parliamentary meetings in different countries including the UK, ‘technical difficulties’ stopped Mike’s calmly delivered over-the-target warnings being heard where the Doc Martens got to present their dramatic presentations.
In a recent interview between Neil Oliver and Ed Dowd they said openly that Mike had been deliberately sidelined by the ‘Truth movement’ leaders ‘because he sounded too extreme’ but that ‘it seems he was right all along’
!
Actions like this of JJ Coueys completely exacerbate the problem.
I maintain that it takes such blindness not to spot Mike’s obvious integrity and lack of artifice that it brings into question the awareness or motives of the attacker.
I am prepared to put it down to paranoia on his part: an over-extended version of Mike’s own doubts about the ‘movement’ and its major voices.
I know of several voices I trust.
How?
Because people cannot act relaxed natural open, honest lack of artifice behaviour.
Everything RM says comes from behind a walled room at the top of a tall tower.
You want to wave your hands in front of his face and say ‘hello?’
Can you glimpse their soul?
If you can’t that is not proof of someone’s malfeasance. People are damaged.
But if you can then this is a huge green flag.
If someone cannot see the pain, earnestness, frustration, open desire to reach minds - for the expressed desire of stopping this juggernaut in every phrase Mike Yeadon utters then my assessment of their character is affected.
Blind or false - everything they say needs more than the usual pinch of salt.
"I maintain that it is a sign of real blindness not to see clearly the obvious integrity of Mike Yeadon."
I completely agree though have come to the reluctant realization that spotting integrity - which is more intuitive or gut-level knowing, than a mental function - has been dismantled for many.
I'm not sure why some have escaped that but I do know the more we value our selves as individuals who must choose and decide for ourselves, the stronger that natural ability to grok integrity gets.
Mike has always been a shining example of human integrity.
I've appreciated JJ's insights in the past (though have not listened to him in many months) this is disappointing.
Thanks for highlighting Professor Couey’s important work, Uwe!
I think simple messages like, “RNA can’t pandemic” cut through the Hegalian Dialectic.
“Wait, what did you say?!”
No. “RNA can’t pandemic” is simply just a nonsense statement probably designed to by-pass any critical thinking on the part of the repeater in order to give birth to yet another distracting and meaningless trope.
A media trope? I don’t think it qualifies as a media trope. LOL.
Do you know how RNA pandemics? Let me help you.
In “the media”.
Wouldn't you have to isolate DNA as an independent variable (not artifact) first,
before you could modulate RNA as a further artifact?
Couey is a monumental wanker.
I'm here for the baseball cap demographic... All you adults can please yourselves. 🤣🤣
The system uses or tolerates supposed "heroes" in the public forum as long as they serve the agenda. They are allowed to argue and conflict with each other but always must be tightly controlled by the system and above all not challenge it. Anyone outside of this like Dr Couey are silenced and suppressed, we live in a world of unbending, unyielding theatre.
Excellent work again Uwe. Really enjoying your substack articles.
Excellent insights, rare even for general, alternative truth seekers. Especially this part and following about how groups are taken over without anyone's noticing:
" Together with the huge number of False-Flag-Operations conducted throughout history, the fact that subverting the opposition from within has been applied especially by oligarchical operations should make us weary of “unity” being the most prominent virtue to observe in the fight for freedom. In fact, to establish a desire for unity within a group is the most powerful weapon for any one power wishing to destroy that group — provided the infiltration of agents of influence beholden to the aggressor has been accomplished first. It is very easy for such agents to act presidential, stay aloof, and give a bad name to those who ask questions about the integrity of prominent figures or organisations. "
Thanks Uwe for continuing to expose the the involvement of crypto-Scientologists in the Health Freedom movement!
Crypto-Scientologists are very much involved in the alt health and Medical Freedom movements. They run influence campaigns and employ false front NGO's. In the 1980's Hubbard charged his followers to make "detoxing" as popular as jogging: “FASE was originally created to put Scientology covertly into schools and government, to give the Purification Rundown an air of respectability,”
https://www.apologeticsindex.org/412-foundation-for-advancements-in-science-and-education-fase
The "autism epidemic" narrative has been tremendously helpful to them in furthering their Purif Rundown "tech" amongst the general population. Crypto-Scientologists have been involved in the autism treatment marketplace, which is why I have such an interest in their doings.
Their aim, of course, is to replace the Western model of health and medicine with their own, which is to say, that all our diseases are caused by contaminating Body Thetans, which are the fragments of traumatised alien souls: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body_thetan
Which is why some people think it is a good idea to give autistic children enemas with an industrial bleaching agent, per ex- or crypto-Scientologist Jim Humble: https://www.businessinsider.com/mms-jim-humble-bleach-autism-cure-youtube-2019-5?op=1
Sadly, RFK Jr has strong links to Scientology.
He was co-counsel at the high-level Scientology law firm Baum Hedlund et al long before Children's Health Defence:
https://www.wisnerbaum.com/toxic-tort-law/robert-f-kennedy-jr-/
https://web.archive.org/web/20210217190210/https://www.baumhedlundlaw.com/toxic-tort-law/robert-f-kennedy-jr-/
https://www.baumhedlundlaw.com/toxic-tort-law/robert-f-kennedy-jr-/
Scrubbed from Children’s Defense Fund, in-house counsel, Leigh Dundas, Scientologist.
She's handled multi-million $$ cases for Fortune 500 clients and she's prominent in the Medical Freedom Movement:
https://web.archive.org/web/20201102032102/https://ca.childrenshealthdefense.org/about-us/
https://freedomfighternation.org/about/
https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/cultic-handlers
Michael Baum (of Baum Hedlund et al) was an unindicted co-conspirator in Operation Snow White:
"Mr. Baum burglarized the Interpol Liaison Office at the Justice Department on at least three occasions. Those raids netted some three feet of copies of Interpol documents
https://scientologyscandals.wordpress.com/
Baum is a former staffer of C0$'s Guardian Office (their secret service) and was Baum Hedlund’s managing partner until Scientologist Brent Wisner took over.
https://profiles.superlawyers.com/california/los-angeles/lawyer/michael-l-baum/4e41b893-6bb5-4700-99a8-d62804940bdf.html
https://www.truthaboutscientology.com/stats/by-name/r/robert-brent-wisner.html
Baum Hedlund et al attorney Brent Wisner filed the first autism baby food lawsuit in California against several companies, alleging a child was diagnosed w/ autism after eating baby foods tainted w/ mercury and heavy metals:
https://www.einpresswire.com/article/561498646/attorneys-who-defeated-monsanto-file-first-autism-baby-food-lawsuit-in-ca
Brent Wisner chatting with RFK Jr on CHD's The Defender Podcast:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/brent-wisner-rfk-jr-drugmakers-knew-zantac-caused-cancer/
Baum was a key investor in the Reed Slatkin Ponzi scheme--one of the largest in history:
https://www.religionnewsblog.com/16496/scientology-groups-to-pay-back-35-million
https://tonyortega.org/2015/06/23/reed-slatkin-dies-of-heart-attack
Interestingly prince Philip parroted the exact words of prince Bernhard in saying he wants to come back as a virus and infect the world
Rubbish from start to finish.
Andrew Kaufman rightly asserts a control establishes if the alleged virus (introduced) is actually present at all. Sure, bacteriophages, cytopathic activity etc. are deliberately misinterpreted. As an example, consider the creation v. evolution argument. Most concious beings would agree that for anything to evolve, it has to exist first. So, as Kaufman suggests, lets use control experiments to establish the existence of the said "virus", "bacteriophage activity", "cytopathic activity",'Santa Claus" whatever you want to interpret it as. Once its existence is established we can then apply Koch's postulates to determine replication, contagion, and so on. Let us not be distracted from the issue of "virus" existence.
If you follow Couey‘s ‘Biology 101‘, you will surely learn something.
https://stream.gigaohm.bio
A non sequitur. Again, establish the existence or non existence of said virus, specifically produce evidence of COVID19, a replication competent obligate intra-cellular parasite. For 5 years now, $1M has been on offer if anybody can. Until reality is allowed a look in, everything else is theatre.
Not at all. You are diverting, for the "issue" of "isolation" is - very likely - a deliberate ploy to keep everyone going round in circles. That is what Couey shows quite successfully! First of all: "virus" is in effect an evolution from what has been studied as "phages" for decades, and which has been completely left out by either side, "pandemicists" as well as "no-virus"-protagonists.
From your alias, I am assuming that you too seem to belong to an aristotelean "either - or" faction. But contemplate the option that both can be right, and both can be wrong, at the same time. A thing can be "A" and "Not-A" at the same time! Which would seem a paradox. But it is through examining paradoxa (go beyond that what is to be expected) that we gain knowledge of a new quality. Parallel lines do not intersect, right? Right in Euclidian geometry, but wrong in Gaussian geometry. Gauss was a platonist. He hypothesized the Higher Hypothesis. Go and study Couey's Biology 101
https://stream.gigaohm.bio/c/biology_101/videos
Clear as mud… as with virology.
There seems an awful lot of pink stuff in it to me.
The issue is not the isolation.
The hard fact that these virus genomes are nothing to do with reality, is also secondary.
The issue is that pathogens of all types are fairy-stories.
So you decide whether I deserve to be listened to? You produce other evidence than "hearsay"? I am not producing any evidence at all. Never said I would. All I said is:
"But contemplate the option that both can be right, and both can be wrong, at the same time. A thing can be "A" and "Not-A" at the same time!"
Couey, in fact, seems to imply that any insistence on "evidence for virus" is a distraction. He has evolved his position, challenging any of his critics to debate him. Kaufmann (and other no-virus campers) apparently demanded he subscribe to their position first, or "produce papers". Which they could easily disprove by debating him. But, they are not. Hmmm. Wonder why...
As for the "interaction" between you and me here, given the kind of responses you are issuing, frankly, I've had enough. Go, and have your "discussions" elsewhere.
Read:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316280466_Virology_State_of_the_Art
The virus was a new and serious one, quite similar to influenza (and rna, too).
https://www.nature.com/articles/nm.3985
The protocol treatments were wrong and very harmful. Sedation, oxygen, ventilator was fatal in many cases.
Lockdowns for all instead of protection for few was a serious (though planned) mistake.
The vaccines didn't and couldn't work. They were harmful for many. (That was clear long before. See e.g. Nature 2015 above.)
As you're so certain about this can you share what you know about detecting novelty viruses?
I am only fairly certain about the nature of viruses. The model of proteins + replicable rna/dna seems to me plausible enough.
from Nature, 2013
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature12711
You are trying too hard, which is a tell. Get them iron shackles on your limbs, and preach then.
You went a very long way around calling Fuellmich a fraud. I, on the other hand, focused on the evidence.
https://substack.com/@francesleader/note/c-112277992
This piece was not about Fuellmich. There is a whole series about him and the oddities. As for judging: I am much more in favor of asking questions. People should come to their own conclusion.
.
RNA gonna infect?
Isn't that like saying things like "No cure for stupid" and "Stupudity must be contagious, at least among the polity."
Scurvy seems contagious until Limeys get their healing limes.
Blueberries are apparently more intelligent than oncologists. Blueberries provide you with cheap delicious and nutricious anti-angiogenesis enzymes that let you prevent a cancerous clump of cells from developing its own blood supply and becoming a tumor. For some strange reason my health insurance doesn't cover blueberries.
Uh oh. I have a bad bad case of acne so everybody says I should go to this professional with a flame thrower because his methods eliminate acne 100% of the time. Of course some of the M.E.'s will write in "acne" as cause of death, but we know they are lying bastards anyway.
I can't argue with everybody but I can make sense of things myself. I can maintain my crap detector and use it often.
Good luck. Remember. Like I've told my daughters concerning potential boyfriends: Some guys are from Jupiter, it's just poetic justice.
mark spark
.
It was quite obvious early on that "Nuremberg 2.0" was a ruse. I was not surprised when the Corona Investigative Committee imploded.
What happened to the substantial funds gathered from donations? Some of it was invested in gold, which has gone up substantially. Others of it was used to pay for building works on a house that Fuellmich and his wife owned and then sold at a profit.
Neither of these seems to be legal or ethical uses of charitable donations.
Now Fuellmich's wife is requesting further financial support from Mexico. You can even make the payment in crypto, even though everyone knows that this is the slick slope to the CBDC financial gulag.