Fuellmich and his team want to convince you that 25 years after he educated journalists of DER SPIEGEL about pitfalls of fishy property deals, he himself has become the victim of such schemes. Really?
I'm glad I never contributed to this effort. I watched many of the interviews and was hopeful that the airing of the expert testimony would bring about change, but now I think my husband may have been right. He did not want me to watch, thinking there was something not quite right about Reiner. It does seem unbelievable that a highly regarded attorney would be taken advantage of as Reiner describes. I pray that the truth will be revealed, whatever that is.
1. He seemed to associate too frequently with members of occult groups.
2. He too frequently entertained nonsense testimony.
3. There were significant testimonies which he refused to air.
4. His "show" was amplified by big tech. He was not demonetized, banned, or treated as a true dissident.
These are classic signs of a chaos agent.
So why should we be surprised when we discover that he is also absconding with supporters' money and sowing chaos within the dissident movement? These are simply additional tactics from the same playbook.
Vivane seems believable. Reiner is good looking and charismatic, traits that can hypnotize away from red flags. The money donated was given in good faith, if Reiner really did pay himself over half a million for emails and put another half million into his house without telling the committee, then he committed fraud and is not to be trusted. What a pity, happens every day though. I have been conned many times.
Do you have a searchable public register of personal bankruptcies in Germany? I'm curious why Fuellmich stated he didn't have a bank account unless he was prevented from having one.
A lot of his behaviour I feel could be explained if he was acting as a bankrupt. The fixation on gold bullion for example.
I'm glad I never contributed to this effort. I watched many of the interviews and was hopeful that the airing of the expert testimony would bring about change, but now I think my husband may have been right. He did not want me to watch, thinking there was something not quite right about Reiner. It does seem unbelievable that a highly regarded attorney would be taken advantage of as Reiner describes. I pray that the truth will be revealed, whatever that is.
I was deeply suspicious of Reiner from the start.
1. He seemed to associate too frequently with members of occult groups.
2. He too frequently entertained nonsense testimony.
3. There were significant testimonies which he refused to air.
4. His "show" was amplified by big tech. He was not demonetized, banned, or treated as a true dissident.
These are classic signs of a chaos agent.
So why should we be surprised when we discover that he is also absconding with supporters' money and sowing chaos within the dissident movement? These are simply additional tactics from the same playbook.
Vivane seems believable. Reiner is good looking and charismatic, traits that can hypnotize away from red flags. The money donated was given in good faith, if Reiner really did pay himself over half a million for emails and put another half million into his house without telling the committee, then he committed fraud and is not to be trusted. What a pity, happens every day though. I have been conned many times.
Do you have a searchable public register of personal bankruptcies in Germany? I'm curious why Fuellmich stated he didn't have a bank account unless he was prevented from having one.
A lot of his behaviour I feel could be explained if he was acting as a bankrupt. The fixation on gold bullion for example.