Leading scientists have long been claiming to know what is "human in form but not in social potential". 'Follow the science' thus reveals a path to destruction of basic Human Rights.
Peer reviewed papers are now meaningless for the de-institutionalized SOC. We don't need a review by a bunch of dumbshits with a compliant mindset. The science/academic authoritarians will soon have to face that more than 50% of the world believes the experimental bio-weapons masquerading as vaccines are deadly. Forever after Covid - there will never be anyone falling-in-line - obedient to an institution that wants to kill us... as authority/rank as taught in college was once revered. Their lack of authority/stature/power will really piss them off too - flipping burgers at Wendy's - when the only ones not dying from myocarditis at the drive-up window are the de-institutionalized self-thinkers. Never forget - You are the carbon they want to eliminate.
Dear Uwe: What a key point you make: That "science" and ethics and seats of learning are differentiating between what looks like a human being, and is claiming that the inner potential, is what defines a human, not the person's form, or even the person's DNA. This is a moral disaster and ushers in 21st Century eugenics. This argument is already well employed in justifying both euthanasia of the elderly and euthanasia of those either comatose or suffering from devastating disabilities. I have a column underway about this topic.
We would love to have you as our guest on our radio show again; I'm unable to find your email-- would you please reach out to me? ~ Ginger
This echo chamber of understanding is great! Where are warriors to put a stop to everything we understand as in progress to cull us? Take Davos as in our face example. The foundations funding this cull is where anything substantial has to begin.
Unless the funding apparatus is changed, nothing changes. Very basic...
Focus on the tap root of the tree of death and slavery is missing in these conversations.There are many dead leaders attempting to change this system of slavery. Humans worshipping of this false god is what gives them power over us. Simple and easy to understand but not discussed enough...
This quote is terrifying and an academic and obfuscating way of sayin "the ends justify the means"
"It is clear that if we take the broad ethical question of ultimate ends we shall never reach any agreement. Moreover, those of us who are humanists have a great difficulty in that we are unable to formulate our ends as clearly as is possible for those of us who are Christians.”
This is the ever present and disgusting cry of the amoral or evil individual. The ends can never justify the means in any moral or ethical society. The ends is an uncertain and open future that doesn't exist yet and can therefore NEVER be justified by the means which occur in the very real present. This is an obvious and long known philosophical fact. The philosophy behind this foundational and reasoned ethics long predates Christianity. There can be no reasoning or compliance with this kind of evil if we are to survive as free humans.
Note that the UN declaration does not use the word "shall" but "should". Is this a case of Rockefeller influence that posits it is, only for me and not for thee.
This is a great reminder that people who walk the halls of power seek to control and manage everything in their world. They behave and think like they have OCD and couldn't imagine a plant being in the wrong place or something out of order. They are terrified and insane. Organic means nothing to them. Emergent phenomena is anathema as well. Thank you.
In an interview with Matt Ehret a few weeks ago you mentioned something about a self portrait by Hitler showing him on the unmistakeable bridge at Tavistock, and the gaps in the record about what he was doing just after WW1. Do you have any more information on this?
This is the article I was referring to on “Connecting the Dots with Matt Ehret”.
I have not looked in greater detail into the issue of Hitler’s half-brother. But there is evidence on the internet (including census data) of the half-brother, Alois, getting married to Bridget Dowling in London in 1910. The couple had a son by 1911. They lived in Liverpool.
Point being: this would coincide with Hitler’s presence in Britain. The data on Hitler in Vienna for the same period is very sketchy.
Peer reviewed papers are now meaningless for the de-institutionalized SOC. We don't need a review by a bunch of dumbshits with a compliant mindset. The science/academic authoritarians will soon have to face that more than 50% of the world believes the experimental bio-weapons masquerading as vaccines are deadly. Forever after Covid - there will never be anyone falling-in-line - obedient to an institution that wants to kill us... as authority/rank as taught in college was once revered. Their lack of authority/stature/power will really piss them off too - flipping burgers at Wendy's - when the only ones not dying from myocarditis at the drive-up window are the de-institutionalized self-thinkers. Never forget - You are the carbon they want to eliminate.
Dear Uwe: What a key point you make: That "science" and ethics and seats of learning are differentiating between what looks like a human being, and is claiming that the inner potential, is what defines a human, not the person's form, or even the person's DNA. This is a moral disaster and ushers in 21st Century eugenics. This argument is already well employed in justifying both euthanasia of the elderly and euthanasia of those either comatose or suffering from devastating disabilities. I have a column underway about this topic.
We would love to have you as our guest on our radio show again; I'm unable to find your email-- would you please reach out to me? ~ Ginger
This echo chamber of understanding is great! Where are warriors to put a stop to everything we understand as in progress to cull us? Take Davos as in our face example. The foundations funding this cull is where anything substantial has to begin.
Unless the funding apparatus is changed, nothing changes. Very basic...
Focus on the tap root of the tree of death and slavery is missing in these conversations.There are many dead leaders attempting to change this system of slavery. Humans worshipping of this false god is what gives them power over us. Simple and easy to understand but not discussed enough...
The corporation.
This quote is terrifying and an academic and obfuscating way of sayin "the ends justify the means"
"It is clear that if we take the broad ethical question of ultimate ends we shall never reach any agreement. Moreover, those of us who are humanists have a great difficulty in that we are unable to formulate our ends as clearly as is possible for those of us who are Christians.”
This is the ever present and disgusting cry of the amoral or evil individual. The ends can never justify the means in any moral or ethical society. The ends is an uncertain and open future that doesn't exist yet and can therefore NEVER be justified by the means which occur in the very real present. This is an obvious and long known philosophical fact. The philosophy behind this foundational and reasoned ethics long predates Christianity. There can be no reasoning or compliance with this kind of evil if we are to survive as free humans.
Evil, narcissistic monsters!
Note that the UN declaration does not use the word "shall" but "should". Is this a case of Rockefeller influence that posits it is, only for me and not for thee.
This is a great reminder that people who walk the halls of power seek to control and manage everything in their world. They behave and think like they have OCD and couldn't imagine a plant being in the wrong place or something out of order. They are terrified and insane. Organic means nothing to them. Emergent phenomena is anathema as well. Thank you.
In an interview with Matt Ehret a few weeks ago you mentioned something about a self portrait by Hitler showing him on the unmistakeable bridge at Tavistock, and the gaps in the record about what he was doing just after WW1. Do you have any more information on this?
This is the article I was referring to on “Connecting the Dots with Matt Ehret”.
I have not looked in greater detail into the issue of Hitler’s half-brother. But there is evidence on the internet (including census data) of the half-brother, Alois, getting married to Bridget Dowling in London in 1910. The couple had a son by 1911. They lived in Liverpool.
Point being: this would coincide with Hitler’s presence in Britain. The data on Hitler in Vienna for the same period is very sketchy.
https://open.substack.com/pub/neveragainisnowglobal/p/the-tavistock-hitler-connection?
Thanks!