12 Comments

Scientology is just a rebranding of Theosophy (their occult beliefs are almsot identical) which itself appeared to have its roots in Freemasonry which itself is the descendant of the Knights Templar which in turn is derived from the Kabbalah which itself appears to have been derived from the ancient mysteries of Babylon/Egypt/Greece.

Occult societies are occult societies and have played a huge (but largely hidden and unacknowledged today) role in Western history since ancient times. They have also played a huge role in Muslim history - and I extrapolate (but do not know) that they have played a similar role in oriental history too.

For what it's worth

- almost every founding member of the Nazi party was a Theosophist

- both Theosophy and Scientology seem to be very closely tied to the British, and US (L Ron Hubbard himself was a US naval intelligence agent), intelligence services respectively.

- Theosophy also appears to have had ties to the Bolshevik revolution through at least Rasputin (whose chief lieutenant and posthumous son-in-law was a leading theosophist) although the Freemasonic/Illuminati influence is more easily traceable there

- Freemasonry/Illuminati was the motivating force behind the French and American revolutions

Scientologists seem to have played a huge role within the so-called "medical freedom movement" with many, many of the "dissidents" having connections to scientology and the related "new age spiritual" movement.

At their core all these belief systems are inherently Luciferian.

Expand full comment

I watched the video and read the article you shared. The accusations against Reiner Fuellmich are vague and circumstantial. I have no idea what they actually mean.

When he is out of prison and we speak, I will ask him about them directly.

Thank you for alerting me to this issue.

Expand full comment

Last time I saw you Rima E Laibow (on screen) was in theatrical filming set up at an airport when you played being in a rush leaving the country while giving some insider info to gatekeeper freemason Alex Jones. It was hilarious.

It seems to me that you too are part of the propaganda machinery.

Expand full comment

Comment probably in the worng place for anyone else to make sense of - but I understand :-).

I agree the accusations fall short of definitive proof. It's also possible that I am more inclined to take them seriously because of confirmation bias - I was suspicious of Reiner from the beginning. I always thought he was likely controlled opposition / double agent - grandstanding with his hearings (which included a lot of red herrings / unbelievable nonsense alongside the accurate info), and consuming resources / effort / attention etc. but ultimately leading to no substantive outcome.

If he's a scientologist, or working with them, then he's not doing anything for the greater good.

And obviously you should ask him about this - but

(a) if the accusations are true I very much doubt he will just throw his hands in the air and say "you got me".

(b) the accusations are certainly highly damaging and actionable if false. He's a lawyer. Did he sue? If not, why not?

Expand full comment

I do not know if he sued. I do not know the whole story by a long shot. I certainly hope he is not, but that is all that I can say at this point.

He is not on trial for being a scientologist: he is on trial for fraud that it looks like he did not commit.

Which is, after all, a good thing.

More to follow, of course.

Expand full comment

Let’s assume Reiner Fuellmich was not on trial. But still in Mexico. Would this make things right? Would all be ok? No, of course not. There have been a number of issues wrong about the whole affair. These need looking into.

This is not to accuse Reiner Fuellmich, or anyone else of anything which is not proven beyond doubt.

However, the stakes are high. Therefore it would be naive to not expect attempts to subvert and destroy the resistance from within. As with science, this requires rigorous testing of hypotheses without jumping to conclusions.

If Reiner Fuellmich committed one thing, it is to accuse others with whom he had collaborated for almost two years of psychological defects and of being controlled opposition the moment they asked questions. This is fact. Why did he do that (which unfortunately is like following the playbook of black propaganda)?

Not quite a fact, but a strong evidence is the question of taking a loan from his colleague in the Class Action effort, M. Templin. The money is allegedly from down-payments paid upfront by the potential plaintiffs of the class action. This loan seems to have been put on notice in December 2021 (!) and repaid in December 2022 from the proceeds of the house sale. These proceeds should have gone to the CIC, as Reiner Fuellmich is on record to have put the 700.000 EUR (from donations to the CIC, transferred to him via a different “loan” from the CIC) into his house and was about to repay that “loan” which he was questioned about by Viviane Fischer, Wolfgang Wodarg and other involved in the CIC.

Thirdly, there are questions as to why he (via his Law Firm) received 25.000 EUR per month from the CIC, even though no such deal had been agreed within the CIC (In this respect questions also need to be asked to Viviane Fischer who did not exercise oversight in her role as co-director: How come nobody seemed to be aware of a need of financial due diligence on behalf of the CIC donors who donated in good faith?) But why Reiner Fuellmich saw it ok to receive these amounts of money (appr. € 600,000) when the statutes of the CIC forbade any compensation of directors? That the court threw these questions out, simply assuming there had been services rendered, is quite something in and of itself.

Not as matter of fact but as evidence people should read the statement from Viviane Fischer concerning these questions regarding the CIC internal affairs. They are in conflict with what Reiner Fuellmich has stated publicly. This conflict needs to be resolved in order to understand what went wrong.

https://neveragainisnowglobal.substack.com/p/corona-investigation-committee-put

Expand full comment

Zionists at work! Controlling everything and spreading poison and hate! Evil can never win. Truth always prevails.

Expand full comment

Theosophical movement was genuine, it has nothing to do with Scientology. But that does not mean tha students of Theosophy did not take the true teachings to bend them to their own agenda. Like with everything... knowloedge can be used for good or for bad. And bad guys trying to infiltrate genuine movements. Like freemansonry also had been infiltrated. It is a mess...

Expand full comment

Also be careful with the commenter "Mongol" he's all over ALL the accounts that are onto something real with very long comments with way too many details on an improbable wide range of topics! He's engaging the authors (dangling the red herrings) in long unfruitful discussions and in effect wasting the time of the author.

Expand full comment

Hello,

I've just listened to your interview with Eric and came for a quick comment to suggest that you also do a deep dive into the persona of W Wodarg. He is an imposter and probably a fraud as well.

Especially re 2009 swine scam. He's plagiarised and appropriated the investigative research of a woman, a German investigative journalist. Unfortunately I don't recall her name. So everyone bows for him and the name who blew the swine scam. Hence his credibility in the corona scam.

This Austrian guy, Bobby https://x.com/bobby_network?s=21&t=0zop37NUFx-4J2I2Qfwmgg, who has now stopped all activities (and who showed early on the fraud RF was) also exposed Wodrag.

He may had posted all this on his Twitter account, I didn't follow that as I was in his TG group.

You might have seen this https://video.licentia.net/w/fee39b5d-261b-4ace-94a6-691d9680c31a but it's worth watching it a few times and observe carefully RF's team especially RF and Vodarg and draw your conclusions.

Expand full comment

Scary.

Expand full comment

Thank you.

Expand full comment