»Midazolam Matt, the Serial Killer«
In the UK "Lockdown-Files" have been leaked. Just at a time when more evidence came to light putting the COVID-policies in close proximity of "Aktion T4" of the Nazis to kill "unworthy life."
Just as British MP Andrew Bridgen began to ask questions about a possible scandal around the change of guidelines for treatment of Covid-patients promoting the use of the drug Midazolam against the advice of experienced palliative care specialists, the “Lockdown Files” were “leaked”. These files make former Health Secretary Matt Hancock look utterly incompetent. However, as investigative Journalist James Delingpole points out, the timely release of the Lockdown files, a “distracting, overhyped and likely orchestrated data dump,” may be a “classic Limited Hangout, calculated to deceive and muddy the waters, not to illuminate.” Delingpole goes on to call Hancock a “Serial Killer of the elderly:”
“There is nothing our corrupt, mendacious and hopeless compromised political class would like more than for you to think that Covid was all about cock up not conspiracy. (…) The quid quo pro for [former Health Secretary Matt] Hancock’s agreeing to play the sacrificial lamb, I would guess, is that the story be focused on his bumbling incompetence rather than on his role as Midazolam Matt, serial killer of the elderly.”
Delingpole reinforces what Historian Andrew Barr has said in the documentary Never Again Is Now Global:
“A lot of people have lost confidence in medical profession completely, as well as, obviously, in the media, completely. (…)
It needs to be investigated. But I bet there’s one cause that won’t be investigated. Like the fact that when they were supposedly closing down the whole country in the spring of 2020 to protect all the old people, actually they were murdering all the old people by giving them midazolam and morphine.”
Barr referred to a change in guidelines for treatment of Covid-patients in early 2020, at the very beginning of the so-called pandemic, when in the words of Dr. Mike Yeadon,
“[w]e were told there was a new coronavirus that had emerged in China and was spreading around the world. But here’s the key thing: They told us, it was really super lethal, much, much worse than anything we’ve seen before, perhaps as bad as 1918. Well, it turns out now that however you analyze the data, the threat does not seem to be exceptional. Perhaps in some places a little worse than a bad seasonal influenza. You wouldn’t shut the world down for this. Exaggerated threat, why? To make you frightened. The drive, fear, fear, fear.”
However, in order to justify harsh measures such as strict Lockdown and face masks, and in order to keep up the fear-level in the presence of an “exaggerated threat”, people would have to be dying. But how? By introducing a lethal guideline, maybe?
On April 3rd, 2020, a new “COVID-19 rapid guideline” NG163 was issued by the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) for “managing symptoms (including at the end of life) in the community”, which would be guiding General Practitioneres and medical personel in Care Homes. It advised them to prescribe and administer morphine and the drug Midazolam, which previously had been in use in palliative care for the terminally ill, such as cancer patients in their last days of life. Or as an “execution drug” on Death Row.
Going by the words of the guideline, the intent was to alleviate suffering.
Serious Concerns ignored
In a Letter to the Editor of the BMJ, 11 experienced palliative consultants and academics expressed concern, pointing out that unlike advanced cancer, Covid-19 was a disease from which “most patients without (…) preconditions will eventually recover” — making it “worrying” that this fact was not even mentioned in the guideline that had been introduced:
»So it is worrying that while NG163 states “Note that symptoms can change, and patients can deteriorate rapidly in a few hours or less”, there is no counterpoint that most patients without the preconditions above will eventually recover. In contrast, NICE guideline NG31 emphasised the importance of how to recognise whether someone was dying, but also to keep open the possibility for recovery by ‘monitoring for further changes at least every 24 hours’.(5)
The professionals sound a ringing alarm: Practitioners who are both inexperienced with Covid as well as with medicating patients in palliative care would be started “on potent medications” with detailed advice to “escalate doeses, but but not on monitoring daily or more frequently, and how to wean off medication if the patient stabilises and recovery becomes possible.”
They voice “further specific concerns”: Covid — in contrast to terminal cancer — was not “uniformly fatal”. The doctors saw “Risk of serious harm”:
»The combination of opioid, benzodiazepine and/or neuroleptic is used in specialist palliative care settings for symptom control and for ‘palliative sedation’ to reduce agitation at the end of life. It takes great skill and experience to use palliative sedation proportionately so that extreme physical and existential distress are palliated, but death is not primarily accelerated. NG163 states: “Sedation and opioid use should not be withheld because of a fear of causing respiratory depression.” If COVID-19 infection were uniformly fatal, this would be an acceptable statement. But for people not previously known to be at the end of life, there is potential risk of unintended serious harm, if these medications are used incorrectly and without the benefit of specialist palliative care advice.”
In this context, Delingpoles assessment of a “limited hangout” being performed with the so-called Lockdown-files seems to be quite accurate, given the fact that with the Lockdown Files, Hancock is being made look foolish and incompetent rather than a cold-blooded killer, and the rest of the government get a free pass.
On his Facebook-page, MP Abdrew Bridgen has published the following collection of Voice Messages he has received from people reporting their anguish about the death of a relative due to misappropriation of Midazolam.
What is very worrying is the fact that the guideline may have been issued in nefarious intent. But unless doctors take it as an excuse to silence ethical scruples, these guidelines would have not been able to cause much harm. As Vera Sharav in Never Again Is Now, Episode 2, has said:
»[T]he tragedy is that the medical profession, once again, abandoned hippocratic medicine in which they took an oath of first do no harm to the individual. They became just like under the Nazis, agents of the state who gave their seal of approval to infanticide, euthanasia, and genocide.«
Never Again Is Now. It is not confined to any one country or region. It is global. Whoever takes offense at this conclusion must listen to Marian Turski, must read The President’s Commission Report. Holocaust Survivors like Vera Sharav, Sarah Gross, Henny Fischler and Kati Egett must not be silenced. It is their right and obligation to “alert the conscience of the world and spark public outcry”.