Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Celia Farber's avatar

Uwe, my comment was based on my direct experience of the system. My former best friend at a magazine (SPIN, 1987-1997) was weaponized against me after we took on HIV Inc. After I started investigative reporting. I was describing patterns I know because I have lived them. If you can call this living.

I don't have evidence of Trojan horses around Reiner, but I can't imagine they would fail to install ANY.

That would only be believed by somebody NEW to this war. Back at aforementioned magazine, they placed plants and spies even in the copy editing department, and one such saboteur CUT text from galleys with an exact knife. The passages he cut pertained to the toxicity of AZT—this was in the late 80s. Place was crawling with spies, informers, and saboteurs and they did eventually land the publisher, and myself, in court. On charges that were trumped up—Title 7 stuff.

I should be allowed to speak of patterns I've seen in almost 4 decades of this war, without being held up as Exhibit A for Reiner-philic naiveté.

Who are the "three Berlin lawyers?"

Maybe you could correct the spelling of my name. Not a big deal.

Expand full comment
Celia Farber's avatar

And Uwe you don't need courage to present me with facts. You've been perfectly cordial and there is no "daring" here. I reject all this kind of trauma talk, with due respect. We're journalists.

I don't become angry like a zoo tiger, when presented with facts; if they ARE gold backed facts, I become grateful and even happy.

Such facts are vanishingly rare in Reiner's case.

I question, respectfully, your title: "Dangerous Naiveté." What you are publishing are many questions that are open ended. Journalism is supposed to answer questions. Pin facts down. Not just bask in how good it can feel to be the person who HAS all the right questions.

So help us answer the questions Uwe!

I asked YOU as many clear questions as you asked me.

I do not think my naiveté is dangerous. I do think mistrust is dangerous. Isn't it JUST AS "dangerous" to "blindly" trust Reiner's accusers?

Expand full comment
19 more comments...

No posts