“A memorial unresponsive to the future would also violate the memory of the past.“
Member of House of Lords insults Holocaust Survivor by calling her warnings "bonkers". He should read Elie Wiesel and understand: Never Again Is Now Global!
If you take on the task, like Vera Sharav did, to alert the public on a global scale to the danger of totalitarianism and a possible repeat of genocide, you know up front that the task will not be easy. The Empire will strike back, or at least attempt to do so. Last Saturday this became apparent, when a Baron Moylan, a Member of The House of Lords in the United Kingdom came down with a particularly ugly form of Antisemitism, which tries to cloak itself in the mantle of advocate for victims of the Holocaust. Asked by Host Neil Oliver on his show “Live with Neil Oliver” whether there are “legitimate questions to ask”, Baron Moylan, went so far as to call it “bonkers” what Vera Sharav does:
“Look, you’ve got to have respect for Vera, a Holocaust survivor, and her memories and her reflections on what happened. You’ve got to have great respect for that.
But any suggestion that tries to draw a comparison between power structures in Nazi Germany in the 1930s and the management of the Pandemic today is, actually, completely out of order and bonkers. And it is demeaning also to those who didn’t survive the Holocaust, the victims of the Holocaust, that they should be compared with that.”
Except that Baron Moylan did so to a Survivor of the Shoa, which is not only a complete lack of respect, but an outrage. According to Nobel Laureate and Auschwitz Survivor Elie Wiesel, as survivor, Vera Sharav has the right to see “herself as a messenger and guardian of secrets entrusted by the dead. A survivor fears (…) she may be the last to remember, the last to warn, the last to tell the tale that cannot be told, the tale that must be told in its totality, before it is too late, before the last witness leaves the stage and takes his awesome testimony back to the dead.” (Report to the President, Sept. 29, 1979, page iv)
Why, in God’s name, did the Lord feel entitled to lecture a Survivor about what the Holocaust was? He said verbatim:
“The Holocaust was a project to deliberately murder millions of people.”
As if Vera Sharav, Sarah Gross, Henny Fischler, Kati Egett did not know that! Does the “noble Lord” think those, who have not just lost loved ones at the hands of the Nazis, but suffered pain and hardship themselves were using the name of the Holocaust lightly? Had Baron Moylan intended to be respectful, he had better ask Vera Sharav about her reasons for what indeed are strong words. But the Lord seemed quite disinterested in learning anything about what parallels the participants in the documentary see.
Moylan asserts further:
“However ill-managed it was, people running the response to the pandemic were in their own minds at least doing their best to try and save lives.”
How does the Lord know? And even if it were the case that individuals thought that what they did was appropriate, measured and effective, it would not have been nearly enough. As the President’s Commission Report stated (p.8):
“The Nuremberg trials represent a new international moral standard for they reflect the conviction that each individual is responsible for his actions even in times of war.”
One of the lessons from the Nazi past is the right to informed consent. It is the Sovereignty of the Individual and their Human Rights which have been trampled.
The documentary “Never Again Is Now Global” is Vera Sharav’s contribution in “helping to build a strong and human society based on equality and justice for all” (Sigmund Strochlitz, Member of the Presidential Commission). Equality and Justice for all!
It has never been justified to limit the response to Covid-19 to “only a vaccine” (Bill Gates, who had, and still has, commercial interests in those products). It never was justified to vilify Doctors such as Dr. Vladimir Zelenko and others who had helped thousands, maybe millions of people with early treatment protocols, using repurposed drugs which even the authorities knew would be helpful against coronaviruses. It had never been appropriate to force or coerce billions of people to take experimental injections, a clear violation of the Nuremberg Code.
Whether or not the situation is as grave as it seems to be for Vera Sharav and other survivors is not the question the world should get upset about. It is at least very concerning. Upsetting is the ice-cold denial of reasons for concern by people within the Establishment, such as Lord Moylan, who fail to acknowledge the seriousness of reports such as this one, or this one, or this one.
The benefit of the doubt must be attributed in favor of Vera Sharav and all those who call for immediate halt of vaccination campaigns. It is simply outrageous for the likes of Baron Moylan to insult whistleblowers like Vera Sharav by calling what she says “bonkers”. The fact that presently most medical and scientific institutions seem to see no problem with the widespread use of genetically engineered nanoparticles being injected into billions of people is a case in point for Vera Sharav: Science and Medicine have greenlighted the diabolical experiments and provided cover for eugenicist population ideas of the Nazis. It happened before!
This time, the difference may be twofold: One, it happens on a global scale rather than from within one country and a handful of allies. Two, science has progressed to a degree that death or disease can be triggered with a “time-switch” mechanism.
Ad one: Could it be possible that control of very few powerful individuals or organizations has reached a point at which any dissent in science or the medical can be suppressed? Read the book “The Real Anthony Fauci” by Robert F. Kennedy jr. or view this video to get some directions for solutions to this question.
Ad two: According to experienced experts such as former Pfizer Head of Research, Dr. Mike Yeadon, who said in Episode 4 of “Never Again Is Now Global”:
“And if that vaccine was, say a genetic vaccine like the ones we’ve seen used here, and if that shuts your liver down in nine months, I could design that as well, I promise you. I can put repressors and promoter genes in that, quite short pieces. They look very similar. They look very similar to the ones you’ve got already, so you would not be able to tell. Even people making it would not be able to tell that this is not a vaccine against the variants. But I could insert a piece that will either shut your kidneys down, give you liver cancer, cause you to go blind, anything you like.
I promise you that biotechnology is very powerful and like most things, it’s probably between ten and a hundred times easier to hurt you than to fix you. Why do you think they used genetic vaccines when they’ve never been used before? Because they’ve got another intended purpose. It’s not surprising that foreign genetic material is toxic to you. And yet they’ve managed to put a cloak of lipid nanoparticles around the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines and they slide into your cells without you quite seeing them.”
This is not proof of guilt, but it is proof-of-concept. Genocide is possible on quite a different level today than it was 80 years ago. And it is technological potential which the President’s Commission Report warned about in 1979 (p.6):
“Not only has the moral landscape of human reality been altered by the Holocaust, but the acceleration of technology (…) now threaten human existence itself. By focusing on the dangers inherent in the ends and means of a technological, bureaucratic society, study of the Holocaust and its implications can encourage a renewal of commitment to sanity and humanity.”
Vera Sharav is a “distinguished moral leader in America”. She and her allies do exactly as the Holocaust Commission called for in 1979: to issue “reports of genocide (actual or potential) anywhere in the world.”
“The Commission was burdened by the knowledge that 35 years of post-Holocaust history testify to how little has been learned. Only a conscious, concerted attempt to learn from past errors can prevent recurrence to any racial, religious, ethnic, or national group. A memorial unresponsive to the future would also violate the memory of the past.”
These Lines were written almost 45 years ago. Today we are at a point where nearly 80 years of post-Holocaust history testify to how little has been learned. Baron Moylan should apologize to Vera Sharav!